How Republicans Made Gains In The Senate | FiveThirtyEight [But, also, there were some bright spots — John]

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-republicans-made-gains-in-the-senate/

«Depending on how things shake out in the remaining races, it’s possible that 30 of 35 Senate races (86 percent) will have voted for the same party that won the state at the presidential level in 2016. Compared to past elections, that rate would be very high for a midterm.
….
En route to its gains in the Senate, the GOP defeated three Democratic incumbents: Republican Mike Braun beat Indiana Sen. Joe Donnelly by 10 points, Republican Josh Hawley defeated Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill by 6 points, and Republican Rep. Kevin Cramer beat North Dakota Sen. Heidi Heitkamp by 10. All three seats were in states that President Trump carried in 2016, and they were going to be tough for Democrats to hold given the states’ partisan lean toward the GOP. Add in Florida, which looks likely to be called against incumbent Democratic Sen. Bill Nelson, and a Republican takedown of that quartet would be historically notable. Four Senate incumbent defeats for the non-presidential party in a midterm would be the highest number since eight Republican incumbents lost in 1934.»

Plus Tester in Montana equals five.

There are tectonic shifts in America happening, and not in a good direction. The urban-rural divide is worse than ever and rural America has doubled down on its worse instincts.

Maybe. There were also some bright spots: Kobach lost in Kansas, Whitmer won in Michigan, looks like Walker’s out in Wisconsin, and all four of the NC statwide judicial candidates endorsed by The Independent won. For North Carolina, that’s huge (for now, anyway).

Also, Florida ex-felons get the right to vote (big implications for presidential elections) and redistricting reform and automatic or same-day voter registration passed in a number of states. (https://www.npr.org/2018/11/07/664993438/voters-approve-major-changes-to-redistricting-and-other-voting-laws).

Liberal insurgents not doing as well as Dem establishmentarians

https://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2018-election-results-coverage/#3777

«So far, establishment primary candidates who fended off liberal insurgents in House races are looking good (Pennsylvania 7th, Kansas 3rd and Texas 7th), while winning liberal insurgents are fairing poorly (Nebraska 2nd and Pennsylvania 1st). But especially combined with Gillum’s loss, it may come to be seen as a better evening for sticking with Democratic establishment picks.»

Sorry about Gillum, though.

Looks like the fundamental character of America has not changed from 2016

(and 2016 seems to have betrayed our fundamental character).

https://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2018-election-results-coverage/#3604

«In the 49 counties where we’ve got nearly complete data in the Florida Senate race, the correlation between county-level voting in this Senate race and in 2016 is a whopping 0.99.»

We have so much work to do for 2020.

Final Election Update: Democrats Aren’t Certain To Take The House, But They’re Pretty Clear Favorites | FiveThirtyEight

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/final-election-update-democrats-arent-certain-to-take-the-house-but-theyre-pretty-clear-favorites/

Pretty sure I wrote a blog post a year or so ago saying this same thing. [Edit: https://plus.google.com/+JohnLusk/posts/V2jVZKZQBpa — but Google+ is going away in less than year, so read it while it’s hot.]

«An 86 percent chance might seem like a sure thing, but it isn’t — would you board a plane that had a 14 percent chance of crashing?»

On veterans re-entering civilian life

https://twitter.com/Johnny_Joey/status/1050375869372518403?s=17

Part of a thread:

Johnny (Joey) Jones (@Johnny_Joey) Tweeted:

This isn’t the responsibility of the @DeptVetAffairs alone. I’d argue it’s hardly their responsibility at all. The @DeptofDefense trains vets for 3
months to join, for 6 months to deploy, for year to promote and.. 2 weeks to leave service. The disparity is obvious.

Mark 1:14-15, 21-24; seen through the lens of change in the church

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark%201:14-24&version=NRSV

There’s always that fraction of the congregation, I guess, that objects to something new.

«Now after John was arrested, Jesus came to Galilee, proclaiming the good news of God, and saying, “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God has come near; repent, and believe in the good news.” …. They went to Capernaum; and when the sabbath came, he entered the synagogue and taught. They were astounded at his teaching, for he taught them as one having authority, and not as the scribes. Just then there was in their synagogue a man with an unclean spirit, and he cried out, “What have you to do with us, Jesus of Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us? I know who you are, the Holy One of God.”»

Ok, so it’s kind of… dramatic, I guess, of me to say this (to accuse fellow congregants of being host to unclean spirits), but, seriously, I have feels about some things.

A: “Let’s open the church to the LGBTQ community and stop telling folks they aren’t worthy and welcome!”

B: “What? Are you kidding? Are you trying to destroy the church?”

A: “Let’s do something new!”

B: “No, actually, I like things just the way they are.”

(On a side note: wow, Mark is perfect for Twitter. Short and pithy. How did he know?)