The ‘America First’ Corporate Graveyard

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/the-america-first-corporate-graveyard-trump-economy

The stupidity of Trump and American voters, frankly:

«Throughout each of his presidential campaigns, Trump promised a manufacturing renaissance. This was never likely to happen, despite bipartisan nostalgia for a bygone U.S. manufacturing era. That’s largely because we are now a services-based economy. But a resurgence was especially unlikely given Trump’s specific brand of America First policies, which includes raising costs of the inputs that U.S. manufacturers buy while also closing off export markets where these same U.S. manufacturers hope to sell their products.

The result: There are approximately 80,000 fewer manufacturing jobs today than there were when Trump took office last year. Not coincidentally, steel prices here in the United States are about 40 percent higher than those in Western Europe. The increase in corporate bankruptcies last year was driven largely by industrial firms grappling with tariffs.

The sweeping Trump tariffs have been painful enough. But lately, they have been coupled with new stressors resulting from his war with Iran.

For example, aluminum prices are nearly double what they were a year ago, thanks to a combination of Trump’s tariffs; a shutdown at a U.S. aluminum supplier; and the closure of one of the world’s largest aluminum smelters, located near Abu Dhabi, which was struck by an Iranian missile.

This has hit auto companies especially hard. In an earnings call last week, Ford said it expected its commodity costs this year to reach $2 billion, twice its previous projection, primarily because of rising aluminum prices.

Other manufacturers are feeling the pinch, too: In its own earnings filing today, Whirlpool warned that the Iran war had “resulted in recession-level industry decline in the U.S.” As trade nerds may recall: Whirlpool was one of the very first beneficiaries of Trump’s trade wars in his first term, through his global washing-machine tariffs. The company and its workers initially celebrated—but then they were beset by a series of other “America First” policies (including those metal tariffs).»

Opinion | Why So Few Babies? We Might Have Overlooked the Biggest Reason of All. – The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/07/opinion/birthrate-kids-parents-demographics-future.html?unlocked_article_code=1.glA.uBB-.T6wllX4TJM3D&smid=url-share (gift)

So many reasons. Everyone has a theory. Demographer types have a new theory: massive uncertainty about the future. It seems obvious, but it’s starting to get official, along with people thinking about how to tackle it.

Accreditation of universities in the US South

Mind blown. Doing some research on accreditation for institutions of higher learning, and I ran across this:

«SACSCOC [Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges] has faced significant challenges in its home territory. Florida and North Carolina have passed laws requiring public universities to switch accreditors every cycle, effectively forcing many to leave SACSCOC.»

Why in the world would NC (and FL) require institutions to switch accreditors every 8-10 years? That’s not cheap, getting completely re-accredited by another accreditor. Why???

«Rather than MSCHE [Middle States Commission on Higher Education] capturing all of SACSCOC’s disgruntled or legally-bound members, a new entity called the Commission for Public Higher Education (CPHE) has been formed by six Southern university systems (including FL, TX, and NC) specifically to challenge what state leaders call the “monopoly” of traditional accreditors like SACSCOC.»

Oh.

Let me guess: after one cycle, the law requiring colleges to switch accreditors will magically be repealed. Maybe even by Democrats. But it’ll be too late.

I actually vaguely recall hearing about this recently (the requirement to switch accreditors), but it got buried under the current flood of awfulness and racism.

And why would an entire state university system be “unsatisfied” with their current accreditor? Well… guess who appoints the governance of said state university system?

Inside the Quiet Republican Effort to Flip Fetterman | Politico

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2026/05/04/fetterman-switch-parties-republican-00904177?gpp=DBAA

Oh, yeah, absolutely, Democrats going to war with John Fetterman is a GREAT idea. 🙄

«It goes like this: The more one drifts from their political tribe, the more they’re scorned and mocked by that tribe, often in personal terms. This only prompts the person drifting away to accelerate their turn and adopt the language, customs and some positions of the other tribe with an I’ll-show-them determination. Soon, they’re identifying somewhat or entirely with the new tribe. The path only goes in one direction.»

Why Janet Mills ended her Senate campaign — and Graham Platner triumphed | Vox

https://www.vox.com/politics/487494/graham-platner-janet-mills-suspends-campaign-maine

Susan Collins:

«She’s the chair of the Appropriations Committee. In olden times, that was like a guaranteed lock on winning reelection. It is not as powerful as it used to be, but I do think it’s meaningful in a state like Maine that relies a lot on federal money — and she has just absolutely opened the spigots in the past year.

You can go on her website and you can see all the money and all the projects she’s funded, and there’s these little pins on the state of Maine, covering the entire map. When this money falls from the sky, it’s a huge boon.

And a word of caution on the polling. In 2020, polls all had Collins down heading into election day. She had been outspent by her Democratic opponent two to one. And then she ended up winning by 9 percentage points. So it looks very anti-Collins out there — but I think behind the scenes, she has a lot more support than is obvious.»

Alito Pens Decision That ‘Eviscerates’ The Voting Rights Act

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/alito-callais-voting-rights-act

Soooo…. who wants to claim that we no longer live in a racist country?

«The Roberts Court finally achieved its years-long goal of killing the Voting Rights Act Wednesday, publishing a ruling that, the liberal justices say, will make proving racial discrimination in redistricting virtually impossible.

“Under the Court’s new view of Section 2, a State can, without legal consequence, systematically dilute minority citizens’ voting power,” wrote Justice Elena Kagan in her dissent.

“Of course, the majority does not announce today’s holding that way. Its opinion is understated, even antiseptic,” she continued. “The majority claims only to be “updat[ing]” our Section 2 law, as though through a few technical tweaks. But in fact, those ‘updates’ eviscerate the law…”»