Tag Archives: machineLearning

Language Is a Poor Heuristic for Intelligence

https://karawynn.substack.com/p/language-is-a-poor-heuristic-for

«One clear reason is that corporations would prefer to use machines for a number of jobs that currently require actual humans who are knowledgeable, intelligent, and friendly, but who also have this annoying tendency to want to be paid enough money to support the maintenance of their inconvenient meat sacks. Not to mention the problematic fact that humans occasionally possess ethics, independent thinking, and objectives besides maximizing shareholder profit.»

Kind of a nothing quote, but I still like it.

Here’s a better one:

«The second reason for this choice is that, as Ted Chiang wryly notes, “there is a market opportunity for volleyballs.” The reference is to the movie Castaway, in which a marooned and desperately lonely Tom Hanks makes a washed-ashore volleyball into an imaginary friend. Humans are a social species down to our core; the more modern life erodes our opportunities for actual human companionship — whether it’s by interposing technology as an intermediary into every interaction, or sucking up all our time with the capitalist/consumerist grind — the more desperate we’ll become for friendly-sounding volleyball substitutes.»

Or this one:

«Computer scientist Timnit Gebru (famously fired from Google in 2020 for raising ethical issues around the use of AI) has repeatedly warned that when the public conversation focuses on red herrings — like the potential morality and values of a wholly-theoretical computer intelligence — we cease to ascribe responsibility to the real people and actual corporations that are creating harmful products. Any action taken to counteract those harms would cut into profit, so the LLM-invested folks would really prefer we all worry about a mirage instead.»

«As a society, we’re going to have to radically rethink….»

Well… THAT ain’t happening.

The footnotes are great:

«6. Increasingly I find myself wanting to take journalists by the shoulders and shake them until their teeth rattle. Like Jeff Jarvis, who first correctly noted that ChatGPT “is a personal propaganda machine that strings together words to satisfy the ear, with no expectation that it is right” … and then turned around in the same article [paywalled link] and discussed his “anthropomorphic sympathy” for ChatGPT as a “wronged party”. FOR FUCK’S SAKE, JEFF!»

On ChatGPT

From a good thread:

@stefan@ak.lightnovel-dungeon.de 🔗 https://ak.lightnovel-dungeon.de/objects/7dd10779-0725-4200-a266-93a90a50c0ec – @funnymonkey I just had a good laugh. allow me a quote: “In addition to the possible business threat, forcing OpenAI to identify its use of copyrighted data would expose the company to potential lawsuits. Generative AI systems like ChatGPT and DALL-E are trained using large amounts of data scraped from the web, much of it copyright protected. When companies disclose these data sources it leaves them open to legal challenges. OpenAI rival Stability AI, for example, is currently being sued by stock image maker Getty Images for using its copyrighted data to train its AI image generator.” So OpenAI likely knows full-well that what it does is unlawful and they try to hide in secrecy so they not get sued, Just lovely.

Mata v. Avianca, Inc., 1:22-cv-01461 – CourtListener.com

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63107798/mata-v-avianca-inc/

Utterly fascinating. Document #32, affadavit of Stephen Schwartz, is the most interesting.

Moral of the story: don’t use #ChatGPT to perform your legal (and probably other) research without verifying everything it comes up with through another channel.

#westLaw #nexisLexis legal court documents open access