Disingenuous reporting on Warren’s Medicare-for-all plan by Ryan Lizza in Politico

(Actual tweet thread: https://twitter.com/JuddLegum/status/1190260692189880320?s=20 )

Warren’s Wealth Tax Isn’t The Slam Dunk Progressives Want It To Be | FiveThirtyEight

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/warrens-wealth-tax-isnt-the-slam-dunk-progressives-want-it-to-be/

Oh, dear. This is why we need to win big in the Senate (because we need to overcome folks like Sinema and Manchin).

«…it’s genuinely unclear whether it would ultimately be ruled constitutional. The issue isn’t that Congress can’t enact a wealth tax. It’s that if a wealth tax counts as a “direct” tax, Congress would have to ensure that the amount of money coming from each state was roughly the same on a per-capita basis, as there is a provision of the Constitution that bans direct taxes unless the amount collected is drawn equally from the states based on their populations*. Given that wealth is not evenly distributed across the states, that equal distribution would be functionally impossible to ensure.»

*Article I, Section 2: “Representatives and blah blah blah shall be apportioned among the several states which may be included within this union, according to their respective numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

There’s that infamous 3/5 clause, but the blah blah blah your eye (my eye) so easily slides over is: “direct taxes”. Whatever that is.

The new Democratic senator irritating the left and delighting the GOP – POLITICO

https://www.politico.com/news/2019/10/29/kyrsten-sinema-arizona-democrats-060187

I don’t care as much about those specific programs as I do about re-apportioning the House and adding a couple of Supreme Court justices, but this means we can’t just barely win the Senate; we have to overperform.

«Take the liberal drive to bust down age-old Senate rules in order to pass “Medicare for All” or a “Green New Deal.” Sinema not only opposes getting rid of the 60-vote filibuster threshold for legislation, she wants to restore the supermajority requirement for presidential nominees that has been weakened by both parties.»

What Elijah Cummings’s Death Reveals About White Privilege – The Atlantic

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/10/too-short-lives-black-men/600628/

«Like so many other black men in America, Elijah Cummings died too young.»

Something like this was the one of the first thoughts I had when I heard he had died.

Here are some more links:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/melaniehaiken/2014/01/07/racism-may-speed-up-aging-in-african-american-men/#68c98eb87127

https://www.pnas.org/content/101/49/17312.full.pdf

Revenge porn is being used to smear and discredit a sitting Congresswoman | Moira Donegan | Opinion | The Guardian

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/oct/25/katie-hill-democrats-politics-

«Still, Hill’s own conduct – tacky, unprofessional, and ill-advised as it was – pales in comparison to what is being done to her, which amounts to a misogynist rightwing smear campaign. The publication of the nude photograph belies any claim Red State and other Republicans may make to being concerned about the ethics of Hill’s conduct. Instead, what Hill’s attackers seem interested in is a wholesale discrediting of the congresswoman, complete with psychological abuse, public humiliation, and misogynist cruelty of the kind that is all too common an experience for women, from the most vulnerable to the most powerful among them. The fact that Hill is not a perfect victim should not distract us from the true issue at hand: that Red State and its rightwing compatriots have brought the tactics of domestic abuse into our politics.

….

Hill, for her part, describes her ex-husband as abusive. We do not know where the nude picture of her came from, but if he was the one who sent it in for publication, then that description would seem accurate.»

Can Warren Beat Trump? | The Cook Political Report

https://cookpolitical.com/analysis/national/national-politics/can-warren-beat-trump

Warren needs to appeal both to economic concerns and to people’s sense of decency. Maybe also call out how much our racism hurts us white people. We go gunning for black and brown people in denying school lunches and pre-natal healthcare and so on, and we wind up hurting a lot more people than we think. Which is one of the reasons we have stats like 18th in the world in terms of infant mortality (and the list goes on and on). (Better to just not be racist, obviously.)

«At least three political scientists John Sides, Lynn Vavreck and Michael Tesler, argue that race, not economic populism, was the main driver in the 2016 election. In their analysis of that election, Identity Crisis: The 2016 Presidential Campaign and the Battle for the Meaning of America, they write: “attitudes concerning race, ethnicity, and religion were more strongly related to how Americans voted in 2016 than in recent elections. By contrast, the apparent impact of economic anxiety was much smaller and not particularly distinctive compared to earlier elections. This activation of racial attitudes helped Trump more than Clinton.”

And, in 2020, it will help Trump again.»