Burr voted to convict

Huh. Sen. Burr (R-NC) actually voted to convict. Also, he’s retiring. And he seems to have done a decent job leading the Senate investigation into Russia’s involvement in the 2016 election. I wonder what’s going on there.

(Not that I’d ever vote for him, but I still wonder.)

Trump Impeachment Trial: Live Updates – The New York Times

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/02/13/us/impeachment-trial#7-senate-republicans-vote-guilty-the-most-bipartisan-margin-in-favor-of-conviction-in-history

So… we’ll probably never be here again, b/c we’ll never again have a villain as incompetent as this one. He has proven that impeachment and the Electoral College simply do not work to prevent a severely problematic President from doing profound damage.

«Seven Republicans voted to find the former president guilty of “incitement of insurrection,” with all 50 Democrats, the most bipartisan support for conviction in any of the four presidential impeachments in U.S. history.»

On attractiveness and career success

https://twitter.com/itsafronomics/status/1359169216818118657?s=20

(How DO you measure a subjective thing like “attractiveness”?)

Anna Gifty is on Instagram and young lol (@itsafronomics) Tweeted: Okay shock aside, isn’t it entirely possible that “attractiveness” here is just really a function of privilege, which is what we see across the workforce in high paying positions anyway, e.g. white guys are in positions of power so they’d be rated as attractive etc. #econtwitter

Anna Gifty is on Instagram and young lol (@itsafronomics) Tweeted:

My overall point here is that beauty standards are deeply rooted in colorism and racism so I just feel like “attractiveness” here would be selected upon who looks white and the most wealthy. Just my take.


Great paper though, excited to dive in. #EconTwitter https://twitter.com/itsafronomics/status/1359170217478356993?s=20