The Flood-Protection Rule That Trump Rolled Back | NYT

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/15/climate/trump-flood-protection-rules-infrastructure.html (sadly, not a gift link)

«In the summer of 2017, Donald Trump stood in the lobby of Trump Tower and declared he would heal a “massive self-inflicted wound on our country” by eliminating red tape that he said was making construction in America an arduous, expensive process.

One policy he eradicated that day was a set of standards aimed at ensuring that anything built with taxpayer money — including hospitals, sewage treatment plants, bridges and libraries — could withstand flooding and rising seas caused by climate change.

When Trump was elected, he took aim at every policy linked to the phrase “climate change” and repealed it. President Biden reinstated the standard, which went into effect at most agencies this year.

Quantifying the effects of the standard’s seven-year absence is no easy feat. But Chad Berginnis, executive director of the Association of State Floodplain Managers, said “hundreds of millions if not billions” had been spent on buildings that are unprepared for intense floods.

Can the standard’s elimination be blamed for damage caused by Hurricane Helene or Hurricane Milton? At this stage, officials said, it’s hard to say.

In part that is because there are no national data sets showing infrastructure spending in flood plains. Helene was a one-in-1,000-year hurricane that might have damaged structures even with stricter codes. And finally, federal data might not capture state or local decisions to impose stricter rules even in the absence of federal requirements.

That’s what happened in Hendersonville, N.C., which was deluged during three days of unrelenting precipitation from Hurricane Helene. Adam Steurer, the city’s utilities director, said that when the town built a new drinking water pumping station a few years ago on the banks of the French Broad River, engineers opted to build to 500-year flood levels.

“It was a very early discussion we had because this area goes underwater all the time,” Steurer said. He said that the cost difference was negligible and that putting electrical equipment at higher elevation gave the pumping station extra resiliency. The station is still being assessed, but officials do not believe it was badly damaged by Helene, he said.

The Trump campaign did not respond to requests for comment.

If he wins the White House in November, Trump is widely expected to again eliminate climate policies, including the flood standards.»

Class differences between Nazi SA and SS

Browsing some leftover tabs from yesterday. Here’s an interesting little factoid from wikipedia:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturmabteilung#Fall

«Although some of the conflicts between the SS and SA were based on personal rivalries of leaders, the mass of members had key socio-economic differences and related conflicts. SS members generally came from the middle class, while the SA had its base among the unemployed and working class

I’m thinking about Trump supporters and the nature of revolutions. It’s like there’s always a point where the revolution is subverted by smoother operators not driven by the ideals of the revolution, but by an appetite for power and money.

Trump’s Midnight In America

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/trumps-midnight-in-america

«But the burden can’t all be on the campaign or the candidate. Others could step up.»

Canvass! Join me! You’re probably better at it than I am actually.

«When Trump spews hatred at immigrants, surely it’s time for George W. Bush, the former Republican president, who was—in the tradition of his father and Ronald Reagan—a fierce critic of demagoguery against immigrants, to come off the sidelines and help in the good fight.

When Trump and Vance refuse to back away from the Big Lie, surely it’s time for other Republicans who care about the truth, like Mitt Romney, to spend time explaining to the country how serious the Big Lie was and is.»

Oh, yeah, these guys, too.

Seriously, George and Mitt, if Bill Kristol is calling on you, wtf are you doing?

Late to the party?

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/14/briefing/hispanic-black-americans-election-poll.html?ogrp=dpl&unlocked_article_code=1.SE4.AwfX.rZynIHoXOYQP&smid=url-share (gift)

I feel like David Leonhardt is a little late to the party. I just hope the Democratic Party wasn’t as stupid as he accuses it of being.

(I’ve been banging this drum for a while now: https://herereadthis.blog/page/2/?s=demographics)

Kamala Harris Unveils Economic Agenda For Black Men | HuffPost Latest News

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/kamala-harris-black-voters-economic-agenda_n_670c6fd3e4b04266ae857c44

«A poll from The New York Times released over the weekend found Harris’ support among Black voters to be substantially smaller than estimates of the support the Democratic presidential candidates received in 2016 and 2020. She led Trump 78% to 15%, with only 70% of Black men saying they would vote for her and 20% backing Trump. That said, polls in 2020 and 2022 ended up understating Black support for Democratic candidates.

Indeed, some political experts and organizers believe the hand-wringing over the Black male vote is largely overblown. Black men have consistently turned out for the Democratic Party. A Washington Post-Ipsos poll last month found support for Harris is solid among Black men.

“Black men do not vote much differently than Black women. This is a talking point being pushed that is harmful, trying to lay blame at the feet of Black men,” former Ohio state Sen. Nina Turner (D) wrote on social media.

Still, the Harris-Walz campaign has been working to prevent defections to the Republican Party, having hosted multiple events in battleground states.»

Lunch after canvassing

Jamaican restaurant, reggae on the TV behind me, Indian newscast blaring from the kitchen. (Food’s good.)

Somehow feels pretty damn American and I’m glad to be here at the intersection of reggae and a clipped, professional Indian British accent.

[Oh, forgot to add: good craft IPA from the distillery next door. Good match.]