The #Resistance Had A Very Good Night | FiveThirtyEight

Source: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/did-democrats-just-have-their-first-tea-party-moment-of-the-2018-primaries/

Excerpts:

«The question, however, is whether those more liberal candidates will hurt the party’s chances in November.

….

There’s plenty of evidence that candidates closer to the ideological poles do worse than moderate ones; it’s been demonstrated in political science research, and we saw reallife examples of it in 2010, when Republicans had a wave election of their own against an unpopular first-term president. Although Eastman could certainly still win in a strong Democratic year, we may also look back on her nomination as Democrats’ first “tea party” moment: a general-election opportunity squandered in the primary (or, at least, made more difficult).

….

Jordan, who would become the first Native American governor in U.S. history if she pulls off the upset win, was endorsed by Democracy for America, Indivisible and Cher — three entities not usually known for their influence with Idaho voters.

….

Finally, Republicans held primaries last night too — and, in a role reversal, for the most part they chose more electable options. In Idaho, Lt. Gov. Brad Little, who enjoyed the support of much of Idaho’s Republican establishment, defeated Trump-like businessman Tommy Ahlquist and bomb-throwing tea party Rep. Raul Labrador in the primary for governor. In Oregon, pro-choice state Rep. Knute Buehler fended off two more conservative Republicans with 47 percent of the vote, preserving a potential path to victory for the GOP in the Beaver State’s gubernatorial race.»

Washington Post on Democratic nominations

https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/05/15/the-truth-is-about-to-catch-up-to-trump-he-has-giuliani-to-thank-for-it/

Charlie Cook (of Cook Political Report?), quoted in WaPo:

«Democrats have less margin for error. Things were going so well for them last fall that it was unlikely that primaries nominating exotic candidates would prevent them from winning a bare 218-seat majority. Now Democrats can ill-afford nominating too many candidates who are badly flawed or too liberal to win a district that has voted Republican in recent years.»

NC Senate Republican cut education funding from Democrats’ districts in late-night amendment | News & Observer

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/state-politics/article150397682.html

«Two Democrats joined Republicans in voting for the amendment, but Smith-Ingram said they didn’t know about the cuts because the vote was taken about a minute after the proposal was released. Sen. Don Davis, a Greene County Democrat, tried to ask a question but wasn’t recognized to speak.»

Thread by @benjaminwittes: “I used to believe this. Then we started @lawfareblog. With respect, let me tell you a little bit about why my experience with @lawfareblog c […]” #SourceList

Thread by @benjaminwittes: “I used to believe this. Then we started @lawfareblog. With respect, let me tell you a little bit about why my experience with @lawfareblog convinces me that what @Susan_Hennessey is doing with is really impor […]” #SourceList

Source: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/996000803663110144.html

Interesting Hurlburt tweet #942 (on diversity)

https://twitter.com/sehurlburt/status/995868205888368646

«Been posting about racial diversity lately, & it’s appalling to see white women respond with the same reasons all-male events give for why they have no women. While they are super vocal on their Twitter about why those reasons are no excuse for lack of gender diversity. I see you