Author Archives: John Lusk

Daniel Penny Gets Hired by Andreessen Horowitz

Leave a reply

https://www.thefp.com/p/exclusive-daniel-penny-hired-at-andreessen-horowitz

«“He will learn the business of investing and he will work to support our portfolio companies,” wrote Ulevitch in a note sent to all employees this afternoon.»

“He will LEARN?” What is his skill set now? (It’s clearly not subduing a person in a non-lethal manner.) Did they just hire an unqualified person because of their political agenda?

And, Free Press: his current skill set is reporting you could have included in your story.

Wikipedia says: «He was honorably discharged and returned to New York, reportedly considering higher education and other career paths before the 2023 incident.»

So: no skills. Apart from he learned doing whatever he did in the Marines. Maybe “working the system”?

Experts warn Dems falling for Trump and Musk’s ‘trap’: ‘Don’t swing at every pitch’ – Raw Story

Leave a reply

https://www.rawstory.com/musk-trump-2671092992/

«“My heart is with the people out on the street outside USAID, but my head tells me: ‘Man, Trump will be well satisfied to have this fight,’” former Obama adviser David Axelrod told Politico. “When you talk about cuts, the first thing people say is: Cut foreign aid.”

…

MAGA world, meanwhile, is thrilled to see Democratic lawmakers outraged over the foreign aid issue, Politico wrote in their report, which noted that many in Trump’s orbit believe them to be “wasting political capital defending an agency that they believe the public doesn’t give a rip about. Musk himself spent the following 24 hours posting videos of Democrats protesting the move.”»

In addition to the 51% of the American people who couldn’t care less about brown people suffering in parts of the world they never heard of, I believe there’s a chunk of folks on the left who are focused exclusively on domestic issues.

And I wonder if we’ll ever know how many people who were super-concerned about Gaza just couldn’t bring themselves to vote for Harris.

[Edit: of course, three days from now, at the pace we’re going, USAID will be a distant blip in the rear-view mirror and nobody (other than those directly affected) will remember the rage other than the lawyers involved.]

Rethinking the National WWII Museum in New Orleans, at least a little bit

Leave a reply

Ya know… I always sort of viewed the WWII museum in New Orleans as some sort of Boomer-conservative thing, glorifying war and nationalism (and Murica). But it occurs to me that I might want to reconsider my views at this point, given how much current events track with the past events of WWII (at least as far as politics in Germany) and the fact that America really did fight against Nazism then.

I saw Laffy’s statement that all of Trump’s cabinet nominees are probably going to be approved, and I thought about legislators who supported the Nazis in Nazi Germany and how they fared after the war. Did they live in shame? I did some research. Apparently not (with some exceptions like von Papen, who was never able to restart his political career even though he tried). I think everybody knew, but it always stayed sort of in the background.

And I landed on this article by an academic (a scholar!) written for the WWII Museum. Which seems pretty good, actually, although I can’t tell at this point if there’s some sort of crypto-something going on, but I’ll assume not for now.

https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/justice-in-post-nazi-western-germany#:~:text=Immediately%20after%20the%20establishment%20of,brought%20up%20if%20they%20behaved

Is Somebody Doing Something?! | Jay Kuo

Leave a reply

«The job of politicians from the party that is out of power is to make the political argument for why their party should be returned to power. That means highlighting the misdeeds, mistakes and malfeasance of the other party. It means providing clear statements about the rules, norms and processes that were violated so that the press can report on them from experts whose job it is to understand legislation and limits on power.

Note also that politicians normally do not themselves file lawsuits unless they were personally injured in some way. And even then there are many reasons why lawsuits are best left to other litigants, such as unions, state attorneys general or nonprofits, who have the resources and time to bring complex suits with seasoned lawyers.

Some political responses may help lead to other types of responses, but that is not their primary end. The primary goal of a political response is to make the political case. And that’s it.

So it will help us and our cause to stop rolling our eyes when [emphasis mine — John.], say, a politician writes a stern letter to a Trump official demanding that the administration cease its illegal activity. That is actually what our senators and representatives are supposed to do. That is how they set the record and inform the press and through them the larger public. As discussed above, politicians don’t bring lawsuits. They usually don’t lead street protests. And the more experienced among them don’t waste political capital on performative stunts that don’t actually fix anything.

That said, those letters and statements, which help establish the public record, are a vital resource. They are cited in lawsuits, often as evidence that the administration was on notice of its illegal actions. They point investigative journalists toward more reporting. And they are an important expenditure of political capital, signaling the priorities of our representatives.»

https://statuskuo.substack.com/p/is-somebody-doing-something?r=bwmg&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email&triedRedirect=true

«We can donate to the nonprofits who are litigating constitutional rights on our behalf.»

The whole thing is worth reading. Several good links.